February 24

Responding to New Yorker

Click this link   and http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2012/02/gop-debate-we-arent-family.htmld read the article.  Once you finish reading, write a summary that includes the title, author, subject intended audience, occasion (situation in the world), and purpose.

After you include that, write a second paragraph with TS, CD, CM, CM, and CS that illustrates how the author connected with her audience (you).  Did she use mostly logos (logic and evidence), ethos (appeal to right and wrong), pathos (emotional appeal) or a little of all 3?  Explain.

Ex:  In the article, ____________, was written by _______________.  She wants her intended audience of ________________ to ______________ the subject of _________________.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Posted February 24, 2012 by tashak38 in category Uncategorized

About the Author

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area--Big Up to the East Bay

15 thoughts on “Responding to New Yorker

  1. leticia

    In this article, “The Mail: Re: Red Sex, Blue sex,” written by mike males. He was intented to let his audience know why tennagers this days get praqnant easily. one rason that he qave was, ”
    Duke University economist V. Joseph Hotz and his colleagues have shown that childbearing during teen years is not necessarily an irrational economic choice for poorer populations, and that is why teen-pregnancy rates are highest among Latinos and African-Americans.” I think that he is rite and that the US should give African Americans and Latinos more opprtunities in education and jobs.

    Reply
  2. Renz & Jaspreet

    In the article, G.O.P Debate:We Aren’t Family, was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended audience of voters of 2012 to show their last minute arguements.

    Reply
  3. mike

    In the article , We Aren’t Family , was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended audience to be more optimistic about the next presidental election. The subject of GOP debate was to clear up a misconception about themselves for undecided voters. After the Grand Old Party debate much of the audience has a pretty clear perspective of every canidate.

    Reply
  4. judith

    In the article G.O.B, Written by Amy Davidson an editor at the New Yorker. She wants her intened audience of the United States to get informed about the political debate of our new Republican presidets that dont agree with each other and keep figting about their own point of view in the presidency.

    Reply
  5. jonathan

    In this article the Republicans had a debate in Arizona on Wensday while its getting booooooed!!! An extended squabble about earmarks was punctuated by boos that seemed almost randomly placed, less of ideology than loud, baffled question marks. To the American citizens to inform whats happening by Amy Davidson

    ts: the republican debate

    Reply
  6. jonathan

    In this article the Republicans had a debate in Arizona on Wensday while its getting booooooed!!! An extended squabble about earmarks was punctuated by boos that seemed almost randomly placed, less expressions of ideology than loud, baffled question marks. To the American citizens to inform whats happening by Amy Davidson

    ts: the republican debate

    Reply
  7. J.L

    In the Debate of the Republicans who seem to racist and sexist argue about things that are not important. Santorum was talking about how Obama is afraid to stand up to Iran, and how contraception shouldnt be allowed. Gingrich belives spanish is getto insulting the hispanic community not only that but he believes teachers are evil. The intended audience are the American residents and the purpose of this article was to show how ridiculous the Republicans are.

    Reply
  8. Jeanette

    The article was about the G.O.P. Debate in Arizona, and was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended audience of American citizens to hear the subject of contraception.

    Reply
  9. John P.

    In the article, “G.O.P. Debate: We Aren’t Family,” was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended acknowledge the night of the republican debate in Arizona. The most striking moment of the debate was the booing. John king asked them to describe themselves with one word and Gingrich said he was “cheerful.” Amy said this was either a joke or a euphemism for sneering. There wasn’t much love on the night of the debate. Santorum was attacking Obama and he says, “This President obviously has a problem with standing up to Iran in any form.” He also says that he isn’t going to stop them. Sadly, this didn’t get any cheering. That wasn’t the only hate that night. Romney said the United Auto Workers were like a gang of robbers, public employees as overpaid “servants,” and he also called John King as an “annoyance.” Santorum didn’t get much love. Romney and Paul shared an interest in attacking him. The candidates couldn’t boo with the audience but instead they glared and smirked. The real question is, do they actually think, people would like them better when they act this way?

    Reply
  10. Jordan and Anthony

    The article, “G.O.P. Debate: We Aren’t A Family” is written by Amy Davidson. The Article targets the general population & the debate was held in Arizona. The purpose of the debate was to reach out to the American People about contraception, sex, poverty, teen-age families, and religion.

    The American People are living in hard times. For example, a quote from the article “When you have forty per cent of kids being born out of wedlock, and among certain ethnic groups the vast majority being born out of wedlock, you ask yourself, how are we going to have a society in the future? Because these kids are raised in poverty in many cases, they’re in abusive settings.” shows how families are living in poverty and hard times. The article shows how people will suffer in the long run & will have many hardships to come. People these days DO NOT have the knowledge on what’s going on in major parts of the world that will have consequences later on in life. In conclusion, the American People are living in hard times.

    Reply
  11. Arthur Morel

    In the article the candidates debate about contraception and teenage abstinence.The intended audience is the american people.I believe all 3 candidates are worthless.

    Reply
  12. Ecamacho

    In the article, the guys that are running for president sounded awful. They all got booed by the people of Arizona. All 4 of them ripped Obama for many things that he has done, or that he hasn’t do. King sounded strict and he took the answers very serious while the other 3 were joking around and not taking the questions seriously.

    Reply
  13. Adalberto Gutierrez & Michael Rocha

    In the article, The New Yoker, was written by Amy Davidson . She wants her intended audience of U.S. Citizens to know what the presidents are debating and what they are all about. Which led to one of them getting booed for not supporting gay soldiers.

    Reply
  14. Wobo Atako

    In the article, G.O.P. Debate: We Aren’t Family, was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended audience of the American citizens to inform people about what’s going on in the presidential debate the subject of the G.O.P. debate.

    Reply
  15. John P.

    In the article, “G.O.P. Debate: We Aren’t Family,” was written by Amy Davidson. She wants her intended audience to acknowledge the republican debate in Arizona. It was on television in CNN and one of the striking moment of the night was the booing they received from the people.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to John P. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *